Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach — Melike Nur İnce Nur Filiz Ulutaş Buse Çetin Çağatay Taşdemir

Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach
Melike Nur İnce Nur Filiz Ulutaş Buse Çetin Çağatay TaşdemirSerüven Yayınevi
Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach
Melike Nur İnce Nur Filiz Ulutaş Buse Çetin Çağatay TaşdemirFinancial performance analysis is critical to users such as managers business employees the government lenders investors and others It is crucial for making forecasts for the future evaluating a business s position within the industry and determining its standing relative to competitors Therefore this study analyzed thirty seven companies listed on the ISO 500 2022 list in the Marmara Region and traded on BIST using seventeen evaluation criteria Firstly the financial data of the firms were collected Due to the presence of negative values in the collected data the Z Score Standardization Method was used Subsequently the weights of the criteria were determined using the ENTROPY Method Three different Fuzzy TOPSIS variations were utilized to evaluate the company alternatives These variations were Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS Trapezoidal Fuzzy TOPSIS and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods The evaluation results obtained from each TOPSIS variation were integrated using the Borda Count Method to derive a single ranking Among the evaluation criteria the Inventory Turnover Ratio C1 was the most important with a weight of 0 36 followed by the Book Value Per Share Ratio C15 with a weight of 0 12 and the Current Ratio C1 with a weight of 0 09 Conversely the Operating Cash Flow Ratio C4 Return on Equity Ratio C14 and Price Earnings Ratio C17 were the least critical criteria each with a weight of 0 00 As a result the best company alternatives were AYGAZ FROTO TOASO BOBET and BANVT while the worst company alternatives were DGNMO DEVA VESTL TATGD and HEKTS These findings provided valuable insights for stakeholders enabling them to make more informed investment and strategic planning decisions

Serüven Yayınevi
Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criter

Serüven Kitap
Melike Nur İnce tarafından kaleme alınan Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criter Serüven Kitap eseri olarak okurlarla buluşuyor Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criter Melike Nur İnce Kitap Özeti Financial performance analysis is critical to users such as managers business employees the government lenders investors and others It is crucial for making forecasts for the future evaluating a business s position within the industry and determining its standing relative to competitors Therefore this study analyzed thirty seven companies listed on the ISO 500 2022 list in the Marmara Region and traded on BIST using seventeen evaluation criteria Firstly the financial data of the firms were collected Due to the presence of negative values in the collected data the Z Score Standardization Method was used Subsequently the weights of the criteria were determined using the ENTROPY Method Three different Fuzzy TOPSIS variations were utilized to evaluate the company alternatives These variations were Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS Trapezoidal Fuzzy TOPSIS and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods The evaluation results obtained from each TOPSIS variation were integrated using the Borda Count Method to derive a single ranking Among the evaluation criteria the Inventory Turnover Ratio C1 was the most important with a weight of 0 36 followed by the Book Value Per Share Ratio C15 with a weight of 0 12 and the Current Ratio C1 with a weight of 0 09 Conversely the Operating Cash Flow Ratio C4 Return on Equity Ratio C14 and Price Earnings Ratio C17 were the least critical criteria each with a weight of 0 00 As a result the best company alternatives were AYGAZ FROTO TOASO BOBET and BANVT while the worst company alternatives were DGNMO DEVA VESTL TATGD and HEKTS These findings provided valuable insights for stakeholders enabling them to make more informed investment and strategic planning decisions Yayınevi Serüven Kitap Yazar Melike Nur İnce Sayfa 117 Sayfa Kağıt 2 Hamur Boyut 16 00x24 00 cm Basım Yılı Eylül 2024 Barkod 9786256319806 Kategori Araştırma İnceleme Kuram

Serüven Yayınevi
Financial performance analysis is critical to users such as managers business employees the government lenders investors and others It is crucial for making forecasts for the future evaluating a business s position within the industry and determining its standing relative to competitors Therefore this study analyzed thirty seven companies listed on the ISO 500 2022 list in the Marmara Region and traded on BIST using seventeen evaluation criteria Firstly the financial data of the firms were collected Due to the presence of negative values in the collected data the Z Score Standardization Method was used Subsequently the weights of the criteria were determined using the ENTROPY Method Three different Fuzzy TOPSIS variations were utilized to evaluate the company alternatives These variations were Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS Trapezoidal Fuzzy TOPSIS and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods The evaluation results obtained from each TOPSIS variation were integrated using the Borda Count Method to derive a single ranking Among the evaluation criteria the Inventory Turnover Ratio C1 was the most important with a weight of 0 36 followed by the Book Value Per Share Ratio C15 with a weight of 0 12 and the Current Ratio C1 with a weight of 0 09 Conversely the Operating Cash Flow Ratio C4 Return on Equity Ratio C14 and Price Earnings Ratio C17 were the least critical criteria each with a weight of 0 00 As a result the best company alternatives were AYGAZ FROTO TOASO BOBET and BANVT while the worst company alternatives were DGNMO DEVA VESTL TATGD and HEKTS These findings provided valuable insights for stakeholders enabling them to make more informed investment and strategic planning decisions

Serüven Kitap
Evaluation of Financial Performance of Companies in Marmara Region Through A Systematic Multi Criter