Talks To Teachers On Psychology And To Students On Some Of Life s Ideals — William James

Talks To Teachers On Psychology And To Students On Some Of Life s Ideals
William JamesKriter Yayınları
Talks To Teachers On Psychology And To Students On Some Of Life s Ideals
William JamesThe art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation Even where as in the case of Herbart the advancer of the art was also a psychologist the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter The two were congruent but neither was subordinate And so everywhere the teaching must agree with the psychology but need not necessarily be the only kind of teaching that would so agree for many diverse methods of teaching may equally well agree with psychological laws To know psychology therefore is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers To advance to that result we must have an additional endowment altogether a happy tact and ingenuity to tell us what definite things to say and do when the pupil is before us That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil that tact for the concrete situation though they are the alpha and omega of the teacher s art are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least

Kriter Yayınları
William James tarafından kaleme alınan Talks To Teachers On Psychology And To Students On Some Of Lifes Ideals Kriter Yayınları eseri olarak okurlarla buluşuyor Talks To Teachers On Psychology And To Students On Some Of Lifes Ideals William James Kitap Özeti The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation Even where as in the case of Herbart the advancer of the art was also a psychologist the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter The two were congruent but neither was subordinate And so everywhere the teaching must agree with the psychology but need not necessarily be the only kind of teaching that would so agree for many diverse methods of teaching may equally well agree with psychological laws To know psychology therefore is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers To advance to that result we must have an additional endowment altogether a happy tact and ingenuity to tell us what definite things to say and do when the pupil is before us That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil that tact for the concrete situation though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least Yayınevi Kriter Yayınları Yazar William James Sayfa 128 Sayfa Kağıt 2 Hamur Boyut 16 00x23 50 cm Basım Yılı Eylül 2020 Barkod 9786257033459 Kategori Diğer Eğitim Kitapları Diğer Bilim ve Mühendislik

Kriter Yayınları
The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation Even where as in the case of Herbart the advancer of the art was also a psychologist the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter The two were congruent but neither was subordinate And so everywhere the teaching must agree with the psychology but need not necessarily be the only kind of teaching that would so agree for many diverse methods of teaching may equally well agree with psychological laws To know psychology therefore is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers To advance to that result we must have an additional endowment altogether a happy tact and ingenuity to tell us what definite things to say and do when the pupil is before us That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil that tact for the concrete situation though they are the alpha and omega of the teacher s art are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least

Kriter Yayınları
The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation Even where as in the case of Herbart the advancer of the art was also a psychologist the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter The two were congruent but neither was subordinate And so everywhere the teaching must agree with the psychology but need not necessarily be the only kind of teaching that would so agree for many diverse methods of teaching may equally well agree with psychological laws To know psychology therefore is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers To advance to that result we must have an additional endowment altogether a happy tact and ingenuity to tell us what definite things to say and do when the pupil is before us That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil that tact for the concrete situation though they are the alpha and omega of the teacher s art are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least